System and method for measuring grain cart weight

ABSTRACT

A system of detecting loading and unloading of mobile containers such as grain carts utilizes two low pass filters to determine whether the contents of the container are changing by subtracting one filter signal from the other, and using the sign of the difference. Weighing performance is improved by utilizing accelerometers to compensate for measurement dynamics and non-level orientation. Failure and degradation of weight sensors is detected by testing sensor half bridges. Loading and unloading weights can be tied to specific vehicles by utilizing RF beacons.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to weighing dynamic loads and, morespecifically, to apparatus and method for weighing grain cart loads.

2. The Prior Art

FIGS. 1A and 1B are drawings that show a combine 20 loading grain 22from a field of grain 23 into a grain cart 10. FIG. 2 is a drawingshowing a grain cart 10 with a grain truck 24. Grain carts 10 arelarge-capacity pull-type trailers with a container 12 for grain 22, abuilt-in discharge auger 18, and capacities currently as high as 2,000bushels. A tractor 13 with grain cart 10 typically shuttles grain 22from a combine 20 in a field to a grain truck 24 located at the edge ofthe field. The grain carts 10 are typically loaded by or from a combine20, and then unloaded into a truck 24, with combines 20 and trucks 24typically utilized with one or more grain carts 10 to harvest fields ofgrain. The use of grain carts dramatically increases harvest efficiency,allowing combines 20 to operate nearly continuously with no need to stopto unload, especially since grain carts 10 can be loaded from combines20 while the combines and the grain cart they are loading move acrossthe field together in a synchronized manner. While the grain cart 10 isaway from the combine 20, the combine may continue to harvest the field,relying on its built-in hopper or grain container to buffer theharvested grain. After unloading to a waiting truck 24, the grain cart10 can then head back to receive grain from a (not necessarily the same)combine 20.

Early adopters experimented with cart-based weighing systems, whichquickly became standard equipment currently on roughly 80% of graincarts built in-factory. Weighing systems for grain carts allow thetracking of yields, and help ensure that operators can accurately fillthe truck to capacity with little risk of incurring fines for overweightloads. Grain carts make the use of combines more efficient; weighingsystems can help make the whole process more efficient.

Grain cart weighing systems currently comprise two parts: weightsensors, and electronics that weigh the load and present information tothe user—often called “indicators”. Currently, weight sensors aretypically either load cells or weigh bars. Typically, a plurality ofweight sensors is utilized for each cart. In one typical configuration,there is one weight sensor for each wheel and one for the tow bar orhitch. In another typical configuration, there is a plurality of weightsensors spread out around the grain cart container. Systems offered bymarket incumbents provide a monolithic measurement and display terminaltypically situated in the tractor's cab with wires that connect back tothe grain cart weight sensors, which may have been combined through apassive junction box. In their simplest form, standard weigh scalefunctions are provided including: zero; tare; and net/gross toggle.Advanced systems provide grain management functions allowing harvestingdetails to be captured as transactions.

However, while conventional methods and technologies have gainedsignificant market acceptance, it has been noted that there are numerousissues with the current state of the art. Some of the recognizedproblems are as follows:

Measurement Dynamics.

While on-board weighing systems can generally provide accurate staticmeasurements on level ground, weight measurements can be compromised byforces that originate either on-cart (auger operation) or fromaccelerations due to drops and impacts with obstacles on uneven terrain.The degree of measurement contamination relates to the specific terrain,cart resonances, and vehicle velocity—higher speeds having a moresignificant adverse impact on accuracy. FIG. 3 is a graph thatillustrates the measurement dynamics that may be experienced whiletraversing a rough field, which contaminate the accuracy of the measuredpayload weight. This chart is an example of how measured weight canbounce around as a grain cart moves across a field. Weight sensorsmeasure force, which relates to mass and any applied accelerationsincluding that of gravity and those of vehicle dynamics encountered whena cart traverses uneven ground. When a bump results in an upwardacceleration the weight sensors see an increased force, and whendownward, a decreased force. This is true even if it were possible tomaintain the alignment of the weight sensor toward the center of theearth. Even while stopped, uneven ground can result in inaccurate weightmeasurement, since the axis of sensitivity of the weighing sensorbecomes misaligned with the gravity vector. This typically results inonly a fraction of the load being measured by the weighing sensor, sincethe acceleration or force vector is no longer in just the direction ofthe axis of sensitivity of the weight sensor, but may include componentsin other directions.

Transaction Logging.

While entry-level indicators provide basic weighing functionality,full-featured systems allow capture of weight transfer data(transactions) from cart to truck. Some offer automatic unload detectionto ensure that harvest data is complete and not subject to potentialoperator error due to the monotony and exhaustion suffered by cartoperators.

Generally, unloading the cart (loading the truck) is done while stoppedor at very low speeds, so dynamics are kept to a minimum allowinghigh-quality measurement; however, often the critical start and stopphases involve rapid cart acceleration or deceleration to and from thecombine for purposes of time efficiency; this usually results invibrations seen by the weight sensors. This is also true for the loadingprocess. Such dynamics, and those experienced when shuttling acrossrough terrain, make the ostensibly simple process of automaticallyrecording the weights when they start and stop changing during anunloading or loading process much more difficult. In fact, the processis sufficiently difficult that some manufacturers avoid monitoringweight for this purpose altogether, and instead monitor the equipmentthat drives the grain transfer auger in order to gate the unloadingprocess; this of course does not help in determination of the loadingprocess. Prior to the present invention, there was no system ormethodology available that accurately determined the starting andstopping of loading and/or unloading of such carts in real-worldenvironments without the use of additional sensors to monitor the graintransfer equipment.

Operations Tracking.

Lack of identification of the harvesting equipment (combine and truck)involved in grain transactions limits the usefulness of the collectedmanagement information. Although a grain cart operator could record suchinformation manually, operator error due to the monotony and exhaustionsuffered by cart operators leaves manually collected data unreliable.

No telemetric operational coordination currently exists between graincart and combine. The efficiency of harvest operations could beincreased through reception (or prediction) of combine fill-level andlocation for display to the grain cart operator.

Pre-Emptive Weigh Bridge Failure Detection.

Quality on-cart grain weighing is predicated on having functional weightsensors, such as weigh bars. Over time, these devices can fail bydelamination of the internal strain gauges, vibrational stresses harminginternal wiring, or by physical damage to the bar or external wiring.The damage can occur slowly or abruptly depending on the failure mode,but in all cases ultimately affects the weighing performance. Theoperator may misdiagnose slow or even the catastrophic failures, andcompensate for resulting measurement drifts or offsets by re-zeroing thescale indicator. Such remedies can result in weight inaccuracies anderroneous farm management data. If pre-emptively and properly diagnosed,defective sensors and wiring can be replaced before they impactproduction. However, there is no automated system or methodologyavailable to detect and isolate this problem.

Display Location Diversity.

Although a scale display terminal is useful in both the loading (fromcombine) and unloading (to truck) phases, a single display cannot bepositioned so that it may be viewed practically in both phases becausethe operator faces in opposing directions due to the relative locationsof combine and truck during loading and unloading. Currently, either twodisplays are required, which is complicated and costly, or the operatormust split his attention between the display and the grain transferitself, which is error prone and inefficient.

What is needed, therefore, is a method or methods that can address theabove identified problems in the current state of the art.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This patent discloses and claims a useful, novel, and unobviousinvention for improved weighing and related operational and datamanagement functionality in the farm vehicle field.

According to a first aspect of the present invention, weight andsimultaneous three-axis accelerometer measurements are used tocompensate for at least some of the effect of non-level or roughterrain.

According to a second aspect of the present invention, a methodautomatically detects weights of grain transactions by differencing theweight signal as processed by two parallel low pass filters, each withdifferent pass characteristics.

According to a third aspect of the present invention, a method ofequipment usage tracking involves the use of beacons and signal strengthdetection as an indicator of proximity and therefore equipmentidentification.

According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, a method forestimating a combine's current fill level involves tracking combineperformance using load weight per unit time and per unit area harvested.

According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, a method ispresented for electrically testing weigh bars installed on a grain cart.

According to a sixth aspect of the present invention, a method forenhancing display location diversity involves automatically reversingthe displayed image when unloading, and reflecting and restoring theimage using a mirror located conveniently for the operator.

A detailed description of exemplary embodiments of the present inventionis given in the following. It is to be understood, however, that theinvention is not to be construed as being limited to these embodiments.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1A and 1B are drawings that show a combine loading grain into agrain cart;

FIG. 2 is a drawing showing a grain cart with a grain truck;

FIG. 3 is a graph that illustrates the measurement dynamics that may beexperienced while traversing a rough field;

FIG. 4 is a drawing showing a grain cart 10 with weight sensorsinstalled, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the presentinvention;

FIG. 5 is a drawing similar to the drawing shown in FIG. 3, with a linefit to the data points utilizing least-squares;

FIG. 6 is a graph that shows the original and filtered signals at thetransition into an unload event;

FIG. 7 is a drawing that shows an exemplary signal chain of the“unloading” detection process, in accordance with one embodiment of thepresent invention;

FIG. 8A is a diagram that shows a standard weighbridge;

FIG. 8B is a diagram that shows diagnostic circuitry on a half bridge,in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention; and

FIGS. 9A and 9B are drawings that illustrate a tablet showingloading/unloading information. FIG. 9A shows the tablet normally, andFIG. 9B shows the tablet reversed.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention differs from solutions offered by others as itdoes not have a monolithic topology, but instead uses a mobile device asthe display terminal, user interface, and processing engine, and whichconnects wirelessly to electronics located on a grain cart. The signalsfrom weight sensors are combined through use of a junction box; theresulting signal is then forwarded to the electronics for measurement,conversion, and transmission to the mobile device. Leveraging mobiledevices in the present invention reduces product cost, increasesprocessing capacity, and provides advanced data connectivity andnavigational capabilities, while enhancing customer familiarity and thusmarket acceptance. This topology is shown in FIG. 4.

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention will now be describedwith reference to the appended drawings.

Measurement Dynamics.

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention can include techniques toassist with achieving improved weight and mass measurements as describedbelow, using accelerometer-compensated mass measurement.

Effects of non-level orientation and in-motion vibration can be reducedfrom mass measurements by compensating weight measurements withsimultaneous accelerometer measurements, given matching bandwidths. Oneexemplary embodiment uses STmicroelectronics LIS3DH three-axisaccelerometer integrated circuits as part of a printed circuit board,with one three-axis accelerometer mounted preferably near each of theweight sensors.

FIG. 4 is a drawing showing a grain cart 10 with weight sensors 14installed, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the presentinvention. The signals from each of the weight sensors are received byinterface electronics with on-board three-axis accelerometer 16. Theinterface electronics 16 perform signal measurement, conversion, andtransmission of the signals to a mobile device that may be located inthe tractor 13 towing the grain cart 10. In one embodiment of thepresent invention, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) is utilized to transmitthe signals wirelessly. Other transmission means are also within thescope of the present invention. In one embodiment of the presentinvention, the mobile device 17 receiving the signals is a tablet, suchas an iPad. Other mobile devices 17 are also within the scope of thepresent invention. Moreover, while the device 17 typically utilized inthe cab of the tractor 13 is mobile, it can also be permanentlyinstalled. Moreover, it can relay the information received, and theresults of calculations and computations performed to other deviceswirelessly or with a wired connection at a future time, for example, atthe end of the work day.

Newton's law of motion is applied as follows in a preferred embodiment:F=m*a  (1)where “m” is the total mass of payload and carrier; “F” is the totalinstantaneous force of the payload and carrier weights as seen by theweight sensors; and “a” is the instantaneous acceleration projectedalong the axis of measurement of the weight sensors.

Two exemplary methods are shown below sharing various commonalities.Common to both exemplary methods are sensor mounting, determination ofreference gravity vector, and projection of the instantaneousacceleration measurements along the reference gravity vector.

Sensor Mounting:

Sensors are to be mounted as follows in the exemplary methods:

-   -   (1) Mount each single-axis weight sensor so that it is most        sensitive in the downward direction (toward the center of the        Earth) while the cart is stationary and on level ground. Other        configurations are also within the scope of the present        invention. However, this configuration is preferred, since it        easily allows a reference acceleration vector that aligns with        the axis of sensitivity of the weighing sensors to be recorded        when stopped on level ground.    -   (2) Mount one or more three-axis accelerometers in a convenient        orientation on the cart. In a preferred embodiment, one        accelerometer is mounted coincident with each weight sensor, and        a correction is preferably performed on the data from each        weight and accelerometer sensor pair. Other configurations are        also within the scope of the present invention.

Determination of Reference Gravity Vector:

Measure and record a vector of the static acceleration due to gravitywhile stationary and on level ground.

Projection of Accelerations Along the Axis of Measurement of the WeightSensors:

Accelerations projected along the axis of measurement of the weightsensor(s) (a) can be determined by performing the scalar product (dotproduct) of the measured acceleration and the reference gravity vector,which aligns with the axis of measurement of the weight sensors due tothe mounting method described above, and then dividing by the magnitudeof the reference gravity vector.

In the first exemplary method, Equation 1 can be rearranged to yieldmass as follows:m=F/a  (2)The total force (F) is measured with respect to the weight offset (themeasured value seen under free fall). The weight offset occurs at thepoint of zero acceleration, and represents offsets in the measurementapparatus including those of the weigh bars, amplifiers, and dataconverters. The total force (F) can thus be expanded to reflect the rawmeasured force (F_(MEAS)) and weight offset (k) as follows:m=(F _(MEAS) −k)/a  (3)While it is impractical to measure the weight offset directly, a methodis disclosed to find it as follows:

-   -   1) While traveling with constant mass over rough terrain, record        weight (F_(MEAS)) and acceleration data pairs.    -   2) Compute the projections of the acceleration data on the axis        of measurement of the weight sensors.    -   3) Estimate the weight offset (k) by computing the y-intercept        of the least-squares line estimate of weight (F_(MEAS)) and        projected accelerations (see FIG. 5).        FIG. 5 is a drawing similar to the drawing shown in FIG. 3, with        a line fit to the data points utilizing least-squares. Once the        weight offset (k) is known, the total mass (or weight under        constant and known acceleration) can be determined by the        following:    -   1) Measure the instantaneous weight (F_(MEAS)) and        acceleration (a) data pair.    -   2) Compute the projection of the acceleration on the axis of        measurement of the weight sensors.    -   3) Compute the total mass (m) using equation 3.

A second method requires no regression. Instead, two weight (F_(MEAS))and acceleration (a) data pairs can be measured while traveling withconstant mass, and the accelerations projected along the axis ofmeasurement of the weight sensors (a). This provides two simultaneousequations and two unknowns based on Equation 3, thus allowing a solutionfor constant “k” using linear algebra techniques as follows:k=(F _(MEAS1) *a ₂ −F _(MEAS2) *a ₁)/(a ₂ −a ₁)  (4)

The weight offset (k) that is determined can be low-pass filtered oversubsequent measurements to reduce the noise bandwidth. The filter'scorner frequency can be set quite low, since “k” does not vary whilemass is constant. By applying techniques to automatically determine whenthe mass is changing, as discussed in subsequent sections, the inputdata may be gated to ensure that the mass remains constant. Once theweight offset (k) has been determined to be sufficiently wellcharacterized (it no longer changes significantly), the total mass (orweight under constant and known acceleration) can be determined usingEquation 3.

With either exemplary method, the bandwidths of the weight andacceleration sensors should preferably be matched and the sampling timeshould be synchronized. In the exemplary embodiment, evaluation of theabove equations is performed within a processor of the electronics inorder to coordinate the measurements and reduce the needed radiobandwidth. The compensated measurements may then be forwarded to themobile device in the tractor cab.

Automatic Transaction Detection.

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention can include a techniqueto automatically detect weights of grain transactions (cart loads andunloads). It differences the weight signal as processed by two parallellow pass filters, each with different pass characteristics—one highbandwidth, one low bandwidth. The high bandwidth path improves signal tonoise ratio by limiting bandwidth while impacting delay minimally. Thelow bandwidth path further improves signal to noise ratio while addingsignificant delay.

FIG. 6 is a graph that shows the original signal 30 and the highbandwidth 32 and low bandwidth 34 filtered signals at the transitionbetween the regions of constant mass 36 and constant unloading 37 for anunload event.

FIG. 7 is a drawing that shows an exemplary signal chain of the“unloading” detection process, in accordance with one embodiment of thepresent invention. The “loading” detection process is similar withopposite threshold and hold polarities.

During periods of constant weight (neither loading nor unloading), onaverage, the difference (C) of high (D) and low (A) bandwidth signalsremains zero with frequent toggles between positive and negative.However, in the case of continuous loading or unloading, the filterdelay between the two paths causes the difference signal to bepredominantly or even entirely of one sign—in this embodiment positive(loading), or negative (unloading). The signal is nominally thedifference in filter delay multiplied by the rate of loading orunloading. By using filters with a linear phase response, as candesigned by a person of ordinary skill in the art using finite impulseresponse (FIR) techniques, the associated filter delays are fixed andknown, as is the delay between filters. The “difference” signal remainsentirely positive (in this embodiment) when loading is sufficiently fast(or negative if unloading), or the noise is sufficiently low. Thisexemplary embodiment uses moving average filters of length 16 and 7 forthe low and high bandwidth filters, and a sample rate of one (1) Hz.Other filter designs and configurations are also within the scope of thepresent invention.

A measurement is performed to determine the instantaneous noise level(B) of the weight signal; the exemplary method computes the standarddeviation over a moving window of, for example, length 7. A noisethreshold (G) is dynamically computed as the greater of the MINIMUM_LOADparameter (1000 lb typical of the exemplary method) and the product ofthe noise measurement and a fixed scalar constant, such as six (6) asused in the exemplary method. Other methods and configurations are alsowithin the scope of the present invention.

The exemplary method latches and holds a start noise threshold (H) fromthe noise threshold (G) each time difference signal (C) goes negative(weight begins to fall). It also then latches and holds a candidatestart weight (F) from the low bandwidth filter (A) provided thatSTART_CANDIDATE_ACCEPTED is not yet true. While difference signal (C)remains low (unloading), the transactional weight difference (E) betweenthe high bandwidth signal (D) and the candidate start weight (F) maypass a gate for comparison with the start noise threshold (H). If thetransactional weight (E) exceeds the threshold (H) while point C remainslow, the candidate start weight (F) is accepted and held for theremainder of the transaction (START_CANDIDATE_ACCEPTED becomes true).If, instead, difference signal (C) goes positive before the threshold isexceeded, the candidate start weight hold is released and the systemresumes searching for a candidate start weight. Note that wheneverdifference signal (C) goes positive the start noise threshold hold isreleased, and the current noise threshold then passes. Once accepted,the transactional weight (E) continues to rise until difference signal(C) goes positive (weight stops falling), at which point thetransactional weight is latched (I) and compared with the current noisethreshold subject to the MINIMUM_LOAD parameter. If the latched weightexceeds the threshold, the TRANSACTION_COMPLETE flag is set, and thesystem may be then readied for subsequent transactions when theRESET_TRANSACTION line is pulsed high, which relinquishes control of thecapturing of candidate start weights back to difference signal (C). Ifthe weight falls short of the threshold, the system automaticallyrestarts.

In the exemplary embodiment, the processing for this method is executedwithin a mobile device. This is exemplary, and other configurations arealso within the scope of the present invention.

Automatic Operations Tracking.

Exemplary methods of the present invention may include techniques to aidin tracking and auditing field operations as described below.

Automatic Equipment Determination.

For the purpose of automating tracking and auditing, an exemplary methodfor automatically determining the particular equipment used in anoperation is disclosed herein (for non-limiting example, a combine,truck, or trailer). According to this exemplary method, a wirelessbeacon device is placed on each piece of equipment, a receiver islocated at or near the operator, and the system automatically selectsfrom a list of allowed equipment types (for non-limiting example:combines or perhaps trucks) the equipment associated with the beacon ofhighest signal strength as the equipment used in an operation.

For a non-limiting example, while loading in the field, the combinecurrently loading the cart can be detected as closest and thus assignedto the transaction. Similarly while unloading, a truck receiving thegrain can be detected as the closest truck and thus assigned to thetransaction. Combined with the time, location, and event details (forexample transactional weight) a detailed audit trail can be provided forfield operations.

In another non-limiting example a list of detected equipment could bepresented to the user and a selection by the user could be used todetermine the equipment used in the operation. Before being presented tothe user this list could be further limited to detected equipment wherethe associated beacon signal strength exceeds a threshold. This may beuseful in cases where equipment are in close proximity such as whenmultiple trucks are waiting to be loaded with grain. In the case whereonly a single equipment has a beacon signal exceeding the threshold thatequipment could be automatically determined as the equipment used in theoperation.

The exemplary method uses stand-alone Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)beacons, such as those currently available from Gelo Inc., mounted toeach piece of equipment, and configured to periodically provide itsidentity. A mobile device mounted in the tractor cab monitors theannouncements (e.g. Bluetooth “advertisements”) and processes the eventsin the manner disclosed in order to determine the nearest equipment.Other embodiments could include using an additional mobile device,acting as a beacon, mounted in the cab of the equipment being monitored(the truck or combine cab for non-limiting example). This is exemplary,and other configurations and implementations are also within the scopeof the present invention.

Estimation of Combine Fill Level.

Another exemplary method is used to estimate the combine's current filllevel while harvesting in order to facilitate operations in the field.By tracking the performance of the each combine (load weight per unittime), the method can predict combine fill level using linearextrapolation as follows:{circumflex over (F)}(t)=ΣF _(LOAD) /Δt _(LOAD) *t  (5)Where {circumflex over (F)} is the estimate of combine fill weight withtime (t) since the last load; ΣF_(LOAD) is the accumulated weight of theN most recent loads; and Δt_(LOAD) is the time between the most recentload and the one preceding the N^(th) last load.

This exemplary method uses a value of one (1) for the window size (N).This exemplary method uses the processor of the mobile device to processweights of loads and the time between such in order that it estimate thecombine's current fill level. Other configurations are also within thescope of the present invention. This estimate can be improved by insteadusing GPS locations services so that the system tracks combineperformance per unit of field area harvested instead of per unit time.In this case, combine performance is rated as load weight per areaharvested between loads. This method can predict combine fill levelusing linear extrapolation as follows:{circumflex over (F)}(a)=ΣF _(LOAD) /Δa _(LOAD) *a  (6)Where {circumflex over (F)} is the estimate of combine fill weight witharea harvested (a) since the last load; ΣF_(LOAD) is the accumulatedweight of the N most recent loads; and Δa_(LOAD) is the area harvestedbetween the most recent load and the one preceding the N^(th) last load.

This exemplary method uses a value of one (1) for the window size (N).This exemplary method computes the area harvested as the line-integralof the path traveled, multiplied by the harvester's header width,subtracting that portion of the swath that overlapped previouslyharvested swaths. The overlap is determined using a high-resolution gridrepresenting the field whereby each harvested grid location gets markedso as to be excluded on subsequent paths. This exemplary method uses agrid size of one foot (1′) squared. Other configurations are also withinthe scope of this invention.

This exemplary method uses the processor of a mobile device in thetractor cab to process weights of loads as measured, along with thecombine's current GPS location as measured and forwarded from a mobiledevice, mounted in the combine cab, over the wireless Internet cellularinfrastructure. This is exemplary, and other configurations are alsowithin the scope of the present invention.

Although this method requires that information be shared between acombine and a cart, connectivity need not be continuous as the systemcan fall back to using time-based prediction during periods when thenetwork is unavailable.

Automatic Weigh Bridge Health Detection.

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention may include a techniqueto electrically test the weigh bars or load cells while installed on thegrain cart.

The technique performs operations to test all four resistors that formthe standard weighbridge arrangement. The technique will also work wheremultiple weigh bars or load cells of a cart are wired in parallel (alllike terminals wired together), so that the measured value for eachweighbridge resistor approximates that of the parallel combination ofall like resistors. This makes the measurement less sensitive by afactor of approximately the total number of weigh bars, and someasurement precision must be sufficient to reveal any anomalies.

FIG. 8A is a diagram that shows a standard weighbridge. FIG. 8B is adiagram that shows diagnostic circuitry on a half bridge, in accordancewith one embodiment of the present invention. The analysis preferablysplits the weighbridge symmetrically into left and right halves (seeFIG. 8B). This is possible because the excitation connections aretypically low impedance voltage sources (in the exemplary embodiment,positive and ground voltage rails).

In FIG. 8B, the voltmeter (circle with “V”) of the full bridge (FIG. 8A)has been decomposed into the buffer (BUF) and analog to digitalconverter (ADC) of the half bridge).

The analysis solves for the two half bridge resistors by measuring thevoltage at the midpoint under various conditions and with differentvoltage references. The first step measures the ratio of the voltagedivider formed by the two resistors while the current source isdisabled. This is done using the excitation voltage (V_(CC) and Ground)as the reference for the ADC. The next step uses a fixed voltagereference (often available internal to the ADC) and the ADC to measurethe voltage at the midpoint of the half bridge while the current sourceis disconnected. This step is repeated with the current sourceconnected.

Using network analysis techniques, the value of the top resistor canthen be found as follows:R _(TOP)=(V _(MID2) −V _(MID1))/(I*RATIO)  (7)Where R_(TOP) is the resistance of the top resistor; V_(MID1) andV_(MID2) are the voltages measured at the midpoint of the half bridgewith the switch open and closed respectively; I is the value of theconstant current source; and RATIO is the measured ratio of the midpointvoltage with respect to the excitation voltage, with no current source.

Similarly, the value of the bottom resistor can be found as follows:R _(BOT)−(V _(MID2) −V _(MID1))/(I*(1−RATIO))  (8)Where V_(MID1), V_(MID2), I, and RATIO are defined previously, andR_(BOT) is the resistance of the bottom resistor. In this exemplaryembodiment, the processor of the electronics can perform the healthmeasurements as directed by a mobile device in the tractor cab. Otherconfigurations are also within the scope of the present invention.

Exemplary embodiments may also include a method to isolate individualweight sensors that have been combined as would be done through use of ajunction box 15 (see FIG. 4), so that health detection can be performedon individual weight sensors in order to provide more thoroughdiagnostic capability. This embodiment involves replacing the passivejunction box for which the like terminals of all weight sensors arepermanently joined, with instead an active junction box whereby allconnections for each weight sensor can be individually connected to (ordisconnected from) the measurement electronics through use of digitallycontrolled switches, in order to present any possible combination of theweigh bars. In the exemplary embodiment, the measurement electronicscontrol the switches of the active junction box. This is exemplary, andother configurations are also within the scope of the present invention.

This invention provides a number of different alternatives andembodiments. In one embodiment, the invention can be utilized to troubleshoot weight sensors that do not appear to be operating correctly. Pairsof resisters in the half bridges are serially tested, with note beingtaken whenever the results of the testing are problematic. In anotherembodiment, the weight sensors are tested on a routine or somewhatroutine basis. For example, they may be tested on a periodic basis, ormay be tested daily whenever the system is started. Other alternativesare also within the scope of the invention. A controller may send analert when problems are discovered, or flags or codes set indicatingproblems. This allows weight sensors to be repaired or replaced beforethey fail or are inaccurate enough to affect operations. Otherconfigurations and alternate usages are also within the scope of thepresent invention.

Enhanced Display Location Diversity.

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention may include a method toincrease the diversity of display locations while in operation. Adisplay is located for convenient viewing in one of the two graintransfer phases (loading or unloading). During the other phase, theoperator views the display through a mirror positioned at an angle thatis convenient for viewing during that phase; the mirror reflects animage that is deliberately reversed by the display equipment so that itbecomes restored through reflection. Control of the reversing processcould be applied automatically to reduce the burden on the equipmentoperator. For non-limiting example, reversing control could be linked tothe automatic transaction detection method whereby the display isautomatically reversed while unloading. In this case, the display wouldbe mounted for convenient viewing during loading (combine to cart), andthe mirror used while unloading (cart to truck). The opposite scenariowould also be possible, whereby the mounting locations and reversingcontrol are each reversed. Other configurations are also within thescope of the present invention.

FIG. 9A is a drawing that illustrates a tablet showing loading/unloadinginformation. FIG. 9B is a drawing showing the same tablet shown in FIG.9B, but reversed. The information shown in these displays is exemplary,and the display of other information and other configurations of thedisplay are also within the scope of the present invention.

A user selectable element (not shown) such as a button or checkbox couldbe present in the user interface allowing the user to manually choosebetween the regular and reversed display. This may be useful for testingpurposes, in the case the automatic detection fails to work, or simpleuser preference.

The device could also be configurable to disable one or more of thedisplay reverse methods. For example, a user may desire to disable theautomatic reverse because it is not useful in their work scenario. Inanother example, a user may desire to disable the user-selectableelement because the automatic reverse meets their needs and they wantmore room on the display. This configurability could be present via anoptions or configuration menu in the user interface. Otherconfigurations and options are also within the scope of the presentinvention.

The present invention is targeted at grain cart applications, but isequally applicable for use with other equipment, such as combines,trucks, planters, air seeders, and seed tenders. These types ofequipment are exemplary, and other types are also within the scope ofthe present invention. In all cases, the invention can improve weighingperformance, data quality, sensor diagnostics, and automates andenhances field operations.

Those skilled in the art will recognize that modifications andvariations can be made without departing from the spirit of theinvention. Therefore, it is intended that this invention encompass allsuch variations and modifications as fall within the scope of theappended claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A system for determining when a container isbeing loaded or unloaded, said system comprising: a set of weightsensors attached to the container in a fixed orientation, said set ofweight sensors operative to generate a set of weight signals for thecontainer and its load; a first controller coupled with the set ofweight sensors and operative to receive the set of weight signalstherefrom via an interface, the first controller operative, basedthereon, to determine whether or not the container is being unloaded orloaded, the first controller comprising: a first low pass filteroperative to accept the set of weight signals and filter the set ofweight signals to generate a first filtered signal, the first low passfilter characterized by at least a first delay; a second low pass filterhaving different characteristics than the first low pass filter andoperative to accept the set of weight signals and filter the set ofweight signals to generate a second filtered signal, the second low passfilter characterized by at least a second delay that is longer than thefirst delay; and a first set of logic coupled with the first and secondlow pass filters and operative to receive the first and second filteredsignals and to generate a first weight-changing signal based thereon,the first weight-changing signal having a first value or a second value,wherein the first set of logic is operative to generate the firstweight-changing signal having the first value when a difference betweenthe first filtered signal and the second filtered signal has a constantsign of a first polarity, and generate the first weight-changing signalhaving the second value when the difference between the first filteredsignal and the second filtered signal has a changing sign, the firstvalue being indicative of the container being loaded—or unloaded, thesecond value being indicative of the container not being loaded orunloaded, wherein the first weight-changing signal is indicative of thecontainer being unloaded when the first polarity of the differencebetween the first and second filtered signals is one of negative orpositive and the first weight-changing signal is indicative of thecontainer being loaded when the first polarity of the difference betweenthe first and second filtered signals is the other of positive ornegative, and wherein the first set of logic is operative to determine aweight of the container when the first weight-changing signal changesfrom the first value to the second value.
 2. The system in claim 1wherein the first controller further comprises: a second set of logicoperative to receive the set of weight signals and: determine aninstantaneous noise level from the set of weight signals; determine anoise threshold from the instantaneous noise level; and utilize thenoise threshold to automatically adjust sensitivity of the first set oflogic to a change in the set of weight signals.
 3. The system in claim 1further comprising a second controller, said second controller coupledto the set of weight sensors, receiving the set of weight signals fromthe set of weight sensors, and transmitting it to the first controllerwirelessly.
 4. The system of claim 3 wherein the first controller iscomprised by a mobile device.
 5. The system in claim 1 wherein: the setof weight sensors comprises a plurality of weight sensors generating aplurality of weight signals; and the plurality of weight signals arecombined to generate the set of weight signals.
 6. The system in claim 1wherein noise thresholds are utilized to automatically adjust rejectioncriteria for the weight-changing signals that do not correspond toactual loading or unloading processes.
 7. The system in claim 1 wherein:the set of weight sensors comprises one of a weigh bar, a load cell, aplurality of weigh bars, or a plurality of load cells.
 8. The system ofclaim 1 wherein the first controller further comprises: a second set oflogic operative to receive the first and second filtered signals andgenerate a second weight-changing signal having a third value or afourth value, wherein the third value is generated when a differencebetween the first filtered signal and the second filtered signal has aconstant sign, and the fourth value is generated when the difference hasa changing sign, the second set of logic being operative to determinethat the container is being the other one of loaded or unloaded when thethird value is generated and the difference between the third and fourthvalues has a constant sign of a second polarity opposite the firstpolarity.
 9. The system of claim 1 wherein the first weight-changingsignal is indicative of the container being unloaded when the firstpolarity is negative.
 10. The system of claim 1 wherein the firstweight-changing signal is indicative of the container being loaded whenthe first polarity is positive.
 11. A method for determining when acontainer is being loaded or unloaded, said method comprising: acceptinga set of weight signals from a set of weight sensors via an interface;low pass filtering of the set of weight signals with a first low passfilter to generate a first filtered signal, the first low pass filtercharacterized by at least a first delay; low pass filtering of the setof weight signals with a second low pass filter different from the firstlow pass filter to generate a second filtered signal, the second lowpass filter characterized by at least a second delay that is longer thanthe first delay; determining a difference between the first and secondfiltered signals; generating a first weight-changing signal having afirst value or a second value based on the determined difference betweenthe first and second filtered signals, said weight-changing signalindicating whether or not the weight in the container is changing due toeither loading or unloading; and determining a weight of the containerwhen the first weight-changing signal changes from the first value tothe second value, wherein the first value is generated when thedetermined difference between the first filtered signal and the secondfiltered signal has a constant sign of a first polarity, and the secondvalue is generated when the determined difference has a changing sign,and wherein the first weight-changing signal is indicative of thecontainer being unloaded when the first polarity of the differencebetween the first and second filtered signals is one of negative orpositive and the first weight-changing signal is indicative of thecontainer being loaded when the first polarity of the difference betweenthe first and second filtered signals is the other of negative orpositive.
 12. The method in claim 11 which further comprises:determining an instantaneous noise level from the set of weight signals;determining a noise threshold from the instantaneous noise level; anddetermining when the loading or unloading process begins utilizing thenoise threshold to automatically adjust sensitivity to change in the setof weight signals.
 13. The method in claim 11 further comprisingutilizing noise thresholds to automatically adjust rejection criteriafor the weight-changing signals that do not correspond to actual loadingor unloading processes.
 14. The method of claim 11 further comprising:low pass filtering of the set of weight signals with a third low passfilter to generate a third filtered signal; low pass filtering of theset of weight signals with a fourth low pass filter to generate a fourthfiltered signal; determining a difference between the third and fourthfiltered signals; generating a second weight-changing signal having athird value or a fourth value based on the determined difference betweenthe third and fourth filtered signals, wherein the third value isgenerated when the determined difference between the third filteredsignal and the fourth filtered signal has a constant sign, and thefourth value is generated when the determined difference has a changingsign, the second weight-changing signal being indicative of thecontainer being the other one of loaded or unloaded when the secondweight-changing signal has the third value and the third value has aconstant sign of second polarity opposite the first polarity.
 15. Themethod of claim 11 wherein the weight-changing signal is indicative ofthe container being unloaded when the first polarity is negative. 16.The method of claim 11 wherein the weight-changing signal is indicativeof the container being loaded when the first polarity is positive.